ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 5257
Sep 12 08 3:19 PM
DocParoo wrote: luvs2mambo wrote: thebatter wrote: Like Quimba said, people should focus on the issues. Absolutely. Unfortunately, Rick Davis said that this election isn't about issues. "This election is not about issues," said Davis. "This election is about a composite view of what people take away from these candidates." An election is ultimately about what you want it to be about. I only have one vote. I base it on what I decide to base it on.
luvs2mambo wrote: thebatter wrote: Like Quimba said, people should focus on the issues. Absolutely. Unfortunately, Rick Davis said that this election isn't about issues. "This election is not about issues," said Davis. "This election is about a composite view of what people take away from these candidates."
thebatter wrote: Like Quimba said, people should focus on the issues.
Interact
Posts: 664
Sep 12 08 3:26 PM
Posts: 7488
Sep 12 08 3:31 PM
thebatter wrote: The problem wasn't her answer. The problem is with the people who don't understand the complexity of the Doctrine pretending that they know why she said what she did, and attacking her for it.
Sep 12 08 3:32 PM
boarderline one wrote: Sarah's questioning Charlie as to what part of the Bush Doctrine he was referring to was correct. When she quizzacally asked "His world view?" She was partially true. Charlie was partially correct but according to this article, Charlie needs some updating on The Bush Doctrine ...a media invention. http://elections.foxnews....ine-hits-the-gibson-mark/
Posts: 1336
Sep 12 08 3:38 PM
luvs2mambo wrote: boarderline one wrote: Sarah's questioning Charlie as to what part of the Bush Doctrine he was referring to was correct. When she quizzacally asked "His world view?" She was partially true. Charlie was partially correct but according to this article, Charlie needs some updating on The Bush Doctrine ...a media invention. http://elections.foxnews....ine-hits-the-gibson-mark/ Whether it's a media invention or not, it has been widely used in articles in the way he was referencing it.
Posts: 1970
Sep 12 08 3:39 PM
justthetracks wrote: Gimme some love right now. I knew what it was and I knew what he meant.
Sep 12 08 3:44 PM
Posts: 18146
Sep 12 08 3:52 PM
Sep 12 08 4:36 PM
yoduhh wrote: justthetracks wrote: Gimme some love right now. I knew what it was and I knew what he meant. well then you know more than the commentator on npr this morning who has written extensively on the subject.
Posts: 357
Sep 12 08 6:19 PM
luvs2mambo wrote: There's no doubt in my mind that Kay Bailey Hutchison could have answered that question well.
Sep 12 08 10:10 PM
Charles Krauthammer who is given credit for coining the term writes in his column: "There is no single meaning of the Bush Doctrine," Krauthammer noted in a forthcoming column. "In fact, there have been four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of this administration - and the one Charlie Gibson cited is not the one in common usage today. It is utterly different."
Posts: 3711
Sep 14 08 6:11 PM
Sep 14 08 6:14 PM
Sep 14 08 6:43 PM
luvs2mambo wrote: DocParoo wrote: luvs2mambo wrote: thebatter wrote: Like Quimba said, people should focus on the issues. Absolutely. Unfortunately, Rick Davis said that this election isn't about issues. "This election is not about issues," said Davis. "This election is about a composite view of what people take away from these candidates." An election is ultimately about what you want it to be about. I only have one vote. I base it on what I decide to base it on. For me, it's issues. I agree with Shoe and batter on that.
Sep 14 08 6:45 PM
Sep 15 08 12:32 PM
yoduhh wrote: so for you it doesn't matter who the dems put up as long as they cite the party line on issues.
Sep 15 08 12:50 PM
Share This